Skip to main content.
« Previous entry: Greenbelt communion service moved | Main page | Next entry: My Spring Harvest diary »

April 1st, 2008

Note about comments etc

daveA word about comments on this site.

I appreciate the comments that are posted here, I really do. I’d like this to be a place where there is room for debate and even disagreement. However, there are a few things I need to say.

First of all, rules. These need to be posted somewhere more clearly really, but for now, they’re here.

I don’t allow comments which:

  1. Attack another individual
  2. Are posted with the main aim of advertising the poster’s website
  3. Contain allegations that can’t be backed up
  4. Contain language I’d prefer not to see on my site
  5. Are comments which the poster wouldn’t make to someone else’s face
  6. Reveal another person’s contact information or pseudonym identity without permission
  7. Are a load of nonsense

I reserve the right to disallow or edit comments for any of these reasons or for any other reason that might not fall into these categories. This list is incomplete, I’m sure. I also reserve the right to interpret these rules as I see fit whilst aiming to be fair. I will allow, for instance, comments that criticise me.

I’m aware that sometimes my moderation is inadequate. Things get through that shouldn’t. This has been especially true in the last few months. I’m working morning, afternoon and evening for rather too many days a week trying to get various projects finished, and so moderating the comments here hasn’t been a priority. I’m not trying to gain sympathy votes here – the fact I have too much to do is my own fault for reasons that are too complicated to explain.

Apologies if I’ve let things through that break my own rules and that have been aimed at you as an individual. If there’s something I’ve missed I’m happy to be contacted so I can take appropriate action.

Pseudonyms. I allow them, though I would request that you stick to one username. In fact from now on I’d like to make this a rule. Contact me if you need clarification about this. There are blog sites that insist you register or use your real name. I’ve thought about these options, but for now the site stays as it is. Please don’t think though that because you use a pseudonym no-on will know who you are. It’s difficult to stay anonymous on the internet for any extended period of time – trust me.

E-mail addresses – these need to be genuine. Sometimes I e-mail the address to see whether they are.

I realise that some of the people who post here are passionate about the subject you’re talking about. Angry sometimes. I understand that and try to make allowances for it.

Occasionally people have been unhappy that I’ve refused to post their comments for one of the reasons I’ve mentioned. If so my advice would be to start your own blog. In fact, why not start one anyway. It really is easy these days – I’d choose wordpress.com for a free site that looks good. (The new Wibsite.com is coming soon, at which point I’ll be recommending that.) See also my post from last year: How to make a website for your church with a minimal amount of effort.

So in summary: please try to abide by the rules. Thank you for reading.

[Updated 11 July 08 with an extra reason for disallowing comments]

12 Comments »



This is a single Cartoon Blog entry, posted by Dave on Tuesday, April 1st, 2008 at 11:05 pm.

If you enjoyed this post you might also enjoy these (possibly) related articles:

Know someone else who might enjoy this post? Click here to send this to a friend. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

The technologically advanced may like to trackback from another site, follow responses to this post via the RSS 2.0 feed, or bookmark this post on del.icio.us or digg.

12 Responses to “Note about comments etc”


  1. Jaded for Jesus says:

    Oh dear, I will undoubtedly fall foul of rule 6…

    Sorry that you’ve had trouble with your comments section, Dave. It sadly follows popularity as night follows day. Looks to me like most of your commenters are fairly well-behaved and pleasant ;-) , but I must have missed the glaring exception. Is there any chance that you can find someone to volunteer to moderate comments for you?

    Finally, the pseudonym thing: people can use them for an array of perfectly benign reasons, as I thought I did… Would any other commenters care to discuss?

  2. Dave says:

    Thanks Jaded for Jesus,

    Yes – there are plenty of perfectly acceptable reasons for using a pseudonym. But I think it is important to remember that at some point in the future someone might work out your identity, therefore it is a good idea only to write things you’d be happy to put your real name to.

    But yes, opinions on this welcomed.

  3. Phelim McIntyre says:

    I have chosen to use my real name because it protects people – now I am outside of the SSG issue I can say things without causing too much trouble for those still inside (though I have messed up recently – sorry guys). If I say something then the Brewers can not suspect someone still inside the bookshops for using a pseudonym which even with mistakes may make things worse.

    On the attacking of an individual or individuals, where there is a consesus that things are wrong we can and have been saying things by reporting the facts. When it comes to an individual situation we can ethically and legitimately post only what we know for certain. We need to be careful with our posts that we do not give people cause for upset or ammunition against us – remember how Dave was misqutoed on Youtube concerning the SSG video. Rather than buyer beware it is blogger beware.

  4. Phil Groom says:

    Seems perfectly reasonable to me, Dave: appreciate all you do, especially on the SSG/SPCK debacle. I keep thinking about running a blog alongside UKCBD but just the thought of dealing with all the comments exhausts me. Keep up the good work!

  5. Bob Gould says:

    Just a word from a dinosaur who has to admit that he merely contributes to his children’s website. You highlight some important issues and manage to keep amazingly upbeat. I’m sure I speak for many who appreciate this (almost) daily tonic, but rarely think that they can add usefully to it. Keep up the good work!

  6. Russ says:

    Dave, I presume point 6 refers more to speculative rubbish on matters of importance, rather than humorous ruminating on inconsequential topics (eg toasting hot cross buns, vegetable racks and the like)?

    Otherwise the deranged burblings of occasional contributors like me might be outlawed. Which could be a good thing for all concerned, but may not be what you intended. Especially if you’re after quirky ideas for future cartoons =:)

  7. Dave says:

    Russ,

    Yes – you are indeed correct. Nonsense of the right sort is welcomed.

    I will have to develop some sort of litmus test so we all know what is the right sort of nonsense.

    Dave

  8. Phelim McIntyre says:

    And here I was thinking the debate about hot cross buns etc was a serious one!

  9. Lexie says:

    Phew!!(on the buns issue) I thought I had broken rule 6 too!

    I agree with what Dave has said. I must admit I always use my real name primarily as I can never remember forum names! but also because its just easier to call me by my actual name.
    I actually think the comments are well looked after – its not too often that I see detrimental comments or arguments get out of control so I think a little reminder like above just ensures that people don’t flaunt the rules.
    Anyway if I ever get out of hand please do not hesitate to tell me, its worth it to keep this wonderful blog safe and welcoming for all.

  10. Iconoclast says:

    Dave,
    Is it possible that your entire blog might be disqualified by virtue of rule 6?

  11. Matt Wardman says:

    I haven’t visited for a bit, but I follow the “pseudonymous but nothing that would embarrass me if revealed” rule.

    >I will have to develop some sort of litmus test so we all know what is the right sort of nonsense.

    I’d be recommending against clarity. That gives a possibiity for decisions to be queried.

    Far better a large dose of Anglican fudge and “this blog is my kingdom and I am a benevolent despot, so there”.

    On other words, pretend to be a Bishop….

    Matt W

  12. Deleting ‘Policing Innocence’ - CCPAS Question Its Conclusions « Chris Kidd - applied youth ministry says:

    [...] While this blog welcomes debate (and recognises the importance of it), it seems to me that it may be useful to have some sort of guidelines.  To help with this I am going to be adopting Dave Walker’s guidelines.  Here is a summary of his guidelines: [...]