<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bishop Gene at Lambeth</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cartoonchurch.com/blog/2008/03/11/bishop-gene-at-lambeth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cartoonchurch.com/blog/2008/03/11/bishop-gene-at-lambeth/</link>
	<description>by Dave Walker</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 07:58:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phelim McIntyre</title>
		<link>http://www.cartoonchurch.com/blog/2008/03/11/bishop-gene-at-lambeth/comment-page-1/#comment-231477</link>
		<dc:creator>Phelim McIntyre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 18:10:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cartoonchurch.com/blog/2008/03/11/bishop-gene-at-lambeth/#comment-231477</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m caught between two stools. I don&#039;t agree that Bishop Robinson should not be invited to Lambeth as he was voted into his position by the majority of the Episcopalian church in America. But neither do I agree with the situation where those who disagree with +Robinson are having to leave the American Episcopalian Church. If we put aside the homosexuality issue then we still have an unrepentant adulterer as a Bishop, should someone in this state be a diocesan bishop? As to born that way, I disagree having read the scientific evidence not just the headlines, but that is not the issue. The issue is the mess that has been made and how we are going to get out of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m caught between two stools. I don&#8217;t agree that Bishop Robinson should not be invited to Lambeth as he was voted into his position by the majority of the Episcopalian church in America. But neither do I agree with the situation where those who disagree with +Robinson are having to leave the American Episcopalian Church. If we put aside the homosexuality issue then we still have an unrepentant adulterer as a Bishop, should someone in this state be a diocesan bishop? As to born that way, I disagree having read the scientific evidence not just the headlines, but that is not the issue. The issue is the mess that has been made and how we are going to get out of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webweaver.pttw (you may call me Miss Webweaver)</title>
		<link>http://www.cartoonchurch.com/blog/2008/03/11/bishop-gene-at-lambeth/comment-page-1/#comment-231143</link>
		<dc:creator>webweaver.pttw (you may call me Miss Webweaver)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 11:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cartoonchurch.com/blog/2008/03/11/bishop-gene-at-lambeth/#comment-231143</guid>
		<description>Is John Shelby Spong invited to Lambeth?

If so, I think maybe he and Bishop Robinson should trade name tags, cause I think it makes more sense to not invite Spong for some of the rather unorthodox things he has said (visualize my eyes rolling) then to not invite +Robinson because he is being honest about how God made him.  (If +Robinson was still in the closet, then the fact that that would be lying wouldn&#039;t bother the sender of invites???  Do we really want to send a message that honesty &lt;em&gt;isn&#039;t&lt;/em&gt; the best policy???)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is John Shelby Spong invited to Lambeth?</p>
<p>If so, I think maybe he and Bishop Robinson should trade name tags, cause I think it makes more sense to not invite Spong for some of the rather unorthodox things he has said (visualize my eyes rolling) then to not invite +Robinson because he is being honest about how God made him.  (If +Robinson was still in the closet, then the fact that that would be lying wouldn&#8217;t bother the sender of invites???  Do we really want to send a message that honesty <em>isn&#8217;t</em> the best policy???)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Orear</title>
		<link>http://www.cartoonchurch.com/blog/2008/03/11/bishop-gene-at-lambeth/comment-page-1/#comment-231051</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Orear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 13:46:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cartoonchurch.com/blog/2008/03/11/bishop-gene-at-lambeth/#comment-231051</guid>
		<description>I just use Google Reader to subscribe to every web site you put out, lest I miss something!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just use Google Reader to subscribe to every web site you put out, lest I miss something!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

