Skip to main content.
« Previous entry: David Walker: Can the bloggers be part of the solution? | Main page | Next entry: Church Politics »

January 13th, 2008

Anglicanblogs .com

I’ve been playing around with the ’site to bring Anglican bloggers together in perfect harmony’ idea.

I have to say I liked Joe’s idea in the comments the other day:

It would be quite interesting to have just to have a single page at Anglicanblogs.com which was a tagcloud of current tags on the anglican member blogs.

Unfortunately having spent a bit of time playing around I can’t quite work out how one would do such a thing. One would need a feed containing lots of different blogs for a start. I’ve tried various methods, such as combining feeds on Yahoo ‘Pipes’, but the number of feeds you can combine is limited to 5 and it just doesn’t seem to work very well.

On the Anglicanblogs.com domain I clicked a few buttons in the hosting panel and all of a sudden I have a ‘Joomla’ website. All very good but
(a) I don’t have time to build a website using Joomla, and
(b) Using a content management system like Joomla involves an admin putting the content together, whereas I think the way to go is a site where everyone puts the content together.

So, I followed Richard’s suggestion and made a site on ‘Ning’.

anglican blogs on Ning

The site is at anglican.ning.com, though at the moment it is invitation only because where you can have a play around with it. I’m not sure whether Ning is the right system to use though, so I’d like a few people to test it for a day or two. Please send me a quick e-mail at dave at cartoonchurch if you’d like to have an invite to test it (or a note in the comments is fine thinking about it). You could also take a look at the Anglimergent site (site for cool Anglicans) to see the kind of things Ning does.

As I see it there are pluses and minuses of using Ning. To start with the negative aspects:

Disadvantages of Ning

Advantages of Ning

I’ve no idea whether this is a good way to go about things. One fairly important thing is that this isn’t a site about me. If we decide to go with it it would be good to have some other people doing the adminning for instance.

It could also be that there is some technical genius out there who could come up with a better way of dong things. If so please do say so fairly soon.

Let me know what you think.

Update: Miffy feels that one more site might be one more site too many. I’m sure others feel that way – feel free to say so.

8 Comments »



This is a single Cartoon Blog entry, posted by Dave on Sunday, January 13th, 2008 at 12:31 pm.

If you enjoyed this post you might also enjoy these (possibly) related articles:

Know someone else who might enjoy this post? Click here to send this to a friend. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

The technologically advanced may like to trackback from another site, follow responses to this post via the RSS 2.0 feed, or bookmark this post on del.icio.us or digg.

8 Responses to “Anglicanblogs .com”


  1. Chas says:

    As someone who already has an identity on Ning, I suppose that I don’t see it as a site too many. My problem is that I am not an Anglican. I was, for a while, but am now, as I was baptised, a Presbyterian (Church of Scotland). I can’t help feeling, just a little, excluded …

  2. Miffy says:

    No, no, no, Dave! Panic not. The Ning site sounds emminently practical. What I was referring to in my blog post was my former allergy to Facebook. But now after reading the comments of other ehrm… folk of more senior bent in the comments on Anglican bloggers I Have Seen The Light! Blessed (re) assurance is mine.

    Though I only signed up to join a ‘Seabird’ group, not yours, I’m afraid. Sorry! ;) Like I said, if I can get in such a tangle here, goodness knows what chaos I would unleash in the Anglican blogosphere, with or without HTML! :D

  3. brownie says:

    One can quickly set up a page to monitor all the RSS feeds from key blogs using Google. You have to create your own iGoogle account which is free. Once you do that you can create tabs or pages about certain subjects or themes. In fact I use my Anglican tab/page to watch The Cartoon Blog which is how I found out someone want to monitor anglcian goings-on from a single page. In this case, the first of three clickable entries under The Cartoon Blog says Anglicanblogs.com. When I click on it I get the content this entry displayed within in that page or I can double click to open it in a new window.

    This doesn’t quite get at the tag cloud idea and doesn’t allow one to directly comment on entries without going to the host site, but does provide a summary at a glance of the top headlines from any Anglican or other type of site that has RSS feed capability. RSS is the orange thingy in the right column under Dave’s column.

    This is easy to do. You don’t have to be a computer scientist.

    Cheers

  4. Dave says:

    Chas, As a commenter on this, an Anglican blog, you are most welcome.

    Miffy – I’m sure you’d only unleash good chaos.

    brownie – Thank you. I think you are describing the subscribing to blogs process, which I agree is a very good thing to do. For the tag cloud we need an even more advanced state of affairs – it is this which flummoxes me.

  5. Miffy says:

    Brownie’s right about Google reader. Even I manage to use it! ;)

  6. joe says:

    Let me have a think about the cloud idea. I’m not an expert, but I think I have seen something similar, so I’ll try to find out how it was done.

  7. joe says:

    Dave, this thing seems to aggregate feeds:
    http://www.suprglu.com/

    There appears to be other ways to do it as well, but this seems to me to be a good way to populate a blog without having to generate extra content.

  8. Matt W says:

    Dave

    pageflakes.com might be one possible idea.

    Also, talk to these people:

    http://justus.anglican.org/soaj.html

    who run anglican.org voluntarily. They may be able to help in providing some ideas about how to go about co-ordinated initiatives – and did some very good pioneering a few years ago.

    blogs.anglican.org, anyone?

    Matt