Skip to main content.
« Previous entry: Things clergy carry | Main page | Next entry: David Walker: Can the bloggers be part of the solution? »

January 9th, 2008

A Facebook Communion?

who is in communionThe Anglicans Online have a front page editorial this week about the Anglican Communion, in particular talking about whether there is a danger of it being a bit like Facebook where one chooses whom one wants to be in communion with.

Christian communion is historically reciprocal, deliberate, public, duty-creating, love-impelling, and church-strengthening. As the ground of Christian life it is not something we choose, but something we are given: given from God the Father through God the Son, enlivened by and filled with God the Holy Spirit. It is a profound, ideally eternal relation with people we may never meet or befriend on this side of the veil. It is a far cry from the point-and-click ecclesiastical relationships we watch unfold week by week in Anglicanism.

It uses my cartoon and comes a few days after the formation of the Anglican bloggers Facebook group, but I think these two facts are coincidental.

Mark Harris has responded with ‘PRELUDIUM: Is the Anglican Communion as we know it … a commonweath in cyberspace?‘. He describes me as ‘the Cartoon Church madman Dave Walker’. I can’t really argue.

Some people in the comments at Father Jake’s site asked whether Facebook was the best place for such a group. ‘Maybe yes, and maybe no’ was the gist of my answer:

I wanted to set up a Anglican Bloggers Facebook group with an ‘open to everyone’ philosophy before someone else started one with the same title but only open to those sharing a particular point of view.

In the longer run Facebook may or may not be a good place to have such a group, but it’s a start. Perhaps, as some have suggested here, some other sort of blog or aggregator might work better in the long term.

In a fit of enthusiasm I went out and registered AnglicanBlogs.com thinking that perhaps a new domain name would sort out all our troubles. I’m forever doing this. I have a list of domain names to remind me of all the projects that never really quite worked or in many cases, saw the light of day.

Thus far it has been most encouraging to see over 274 people join the group from all sides of the central aisle, though perhaps a greater proportion from the liberal side (ie the one where using the kneelers is optional). I’m aware that one or two new connections have been made as a result.

There are other lists of Anglican blogs, but none as far as I am aware covering the whole Anglican Communion. For the Episcopalians there’s a blogging Episcopalians webring, but the links on Anglicans Online to blog lists are now rather moth-eared and overgrown. There is the Technorati Anglican blog list of course, but it doesn’t deserve to be taken seriously for reasons that become obvious as soon as you look at it.

If you have ideas about where we go from here in terms of uniting the entire Anglican Communion using blogging and a hastily purchased domain name then do post them here or on the Facebook wall. I feel sure that cake needs to be involved somehow, but I can’t quite work out how.

Thanks by the way for the continued comments on my ‘ideas appeal’ posts. I print them off and read them in the library or a Basildon coffee shop. The cartoon relating to ‘excuses for absenteeism’ is now complete, the one relating to the ‘things carried by clergy’ is very nearly there but the ‘Fresh expressions’ one will get there eventually. I’m trying to work out a way to reward contributors in a very real way (but not too real). Seriously though – I do appreciate it.

6 Comments »



This is a single Cartoon Blog entry, posted by Dave on Wednesday, January 9th, 2008 at 2:01 pm.

If you enjoyed this post you might also enjoy these (possibly) related articles:

Know someone else who might enjoy this post? Click here to send this to a friend. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

The technologically advanced may like to trackback from another site, follow responses to this post via the RSS 2.0 feed, or bookmark this post on del.icio.us or digg.

6 Responses to “A Facebook Communion?”


  1. Ann says:

    We featured that article on Episcopal Cafe too — and had a little flurry of discussion. Facebook and Communion – there is a list of bloggers linked in the sidebar.

  2. Bimble says:

    For a moment there I thought you were going to be telling us about an official Anglician group on Facebook…

  3. jody says:

    the facebook group I think is great, but perhaps something with more scope, like your website, would be better in the long run, but I’m not sure why I think that at the moment.

    perhaps it is more intentional, or something, agggh I’m blibbering now.

    anyway, I have been perusing the stuff left on facebook, so it’s been good for me, good connections too.

    perhaps websites are simply ‘prettier’ in the way you can set up links to bloggers and other stuff.

    jody x

  4. joe says:

    It would be quite interesting to have just to have a single page at Anglicanblogs.com which was a tagcloud of current tags on the anglican member blogs.

    I think that would give a really good indication of not only the current feelings of bloggers but also Other Issues that bloggers are talking about.

  5. Richard says:

    As a place to start the group, Facebook is fine – the main issues are the fact that it is in a walled garden – you can’t join the group without signing up to Facebook.

    Having said that, Facebook provides all the basic structure you need to run the group.

    The question really is, how many people would like to join the group, but won’t because it’s in Facebook. If that proves to be a significant number, then looking at hosting the group with something like Ning might be an option.

  6. webweaver.pttw says:

    As a Anglican+Episcopal blogger (over on Blogspot) and the webweaver for Peek Through The Window of the Episcopal Church, I’d be very interested in a website that had info on bloggers from ALL over the Communion!

    I second the remarks made by “joe” above about the tag cloud and all, and also Richard’s remarks about the walled garden that is Facebook. (I’m on three other social networks, but not Facebook, and I really don’t want to have to bother with being on four social networks.)