Skip to main content.
« Previous entry: Wrong number | Main page | Next entry: I have a rival »

June 5th, 2007

I like the Olympic Logo

olympic logo

It seems to be fashionable to be against the Olympic Logo, so I am going to be for it.

One reason is that I was once rude about a logo I had seen, and then discovered that the person I was talking to was the person who designed it. I was mortified and have not yet really recovered (I wore sackcloth for a while, but now just prefer to wear a t-shirt with an abrasive label on the collar). Just in case I meet the designer of the Olympic Logo at Tescos whilst pondering the chilled Indian ready meals I am going to say I quite like it.

I suspect the reason that most people do not like this logo is that we have come to expect logos to be boring and corporate. We are so used to seeing the bland and ‘safe’ logos of multinational companies that we have come to think that that bland and safe equals good. This logo is not boring, which to my mind a good thing. Of course everyone thinks they can do better – lots of people have spent twenty minutes on their computer designing a logo and sent them into the BBC, but the results look like designs done by people who have done them in twenty minutes on their computers.

One thing that needs to be borne in mind is that this is not a static logo, but rather an animated one. In five years time of course everything will be animated – adverts, t-shirts, even the labels on chilled Indian ready meals, so there is no point designing a logo that is not animated. You need to watch the video to see the whole animated sort of aspect.

Of course it has not gone down well with the newspapers, though it should be noted that the same tabloids who have poured scorn upon the design have been very happy to receive a large cheque from Lloyd’s bank to display a full page advert with the logo at its centrepiece.

Other Pro-logoers:

prblogger.com » Blog Archive » I like it
Byrne Baby Byrne » London 2012
gapingvoid: "cartoons drawn on the back of business cards": 2012 olympic "brand launch"
The Rosemont Loving: Where is the love?

Update:
John’s point about the Olympics taking funding away from worthwhile projects is one that needs to be heard.

In other news, Radio 5 just phoned me and wanted me to be on their show defending the logo. I declined because my thoughts are jumbled and not well thought out. Also they wanted me to defend the £400 000, which I cannot do. Hopefully they found someone else – the piece is on at about 11 o clock.

28 Comments »



Share this on Facebook:

If you enjoyed this post you might also enjoy these (possibly) related articles:

If you liked this post why not send it to someone else by e-mail? Click here to do so.

This is a single post on the Cartoon Blog by Dave posted on Tuesday, June 5th, 2007 at 4:26 pm. Click here to read all of the latest posts. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Other things technologically advanced people may like to do: trackback from another site, follow responses via the comments feed, bookmark on del.icio.us or digg.

28 Responses to “I like the Olympic Logo”


  1. Jonny Rosemont says:

    Dave, great to see you are positive about the brand, it has been way too negative in these parts. I’ve got another viewpoint on my blog, interested to get your feedback. I think there is a bigger issue here.

  2. Dave says:

    Thanks Jonny and welcome. I’ve linked you in.

  3. Keith says:

    Isn’t this the problem with the Church – our logo is too static. We need something animated! Any ideas?

  4. joe says:

    Can I be agnostic?

  5. ruth says:

    It’s interesting – in my opinion, when you look at the other logos submitted (on your link to the BBC website), you realise how good the official logo actually is. It is something that the others are not: unique. I could swear I’ve seen the others somewhere before (although, of course, I haven’t). (Well, except for the London Underground sign…?????)

    I’m probably just parroting back what you’ve said in your post there Dave – sorry about that, but logos interest me (a bit anyway!) – and I think this is a great one.

  6. Ann says:

    The video is delightful. Nothing to do with church TBTG.

  7. Ellen says:

    good on yer. each to his/her own aye. To be honest I am a bit afraid of it.

  8. Dave says:

    By the way, I’m not allowing comments that make unseemly suggestions about the logo. These aforementioned suggestions are everywhere else on the internet if you want to find them. This thread will remain a refuge from unseemliness.

  9. JDAP says:

    I thought I would try my hand at an alternative. What do you think?

    http://www.parsonses.co.uk/2012OlyJDAP-01.html

    Offered in a constructive spirit!

  10. John Davies on a Liverpool housing estate says:

    It seems to be fashionable in places like Jonny Rosemount’s dizzy head, to be for the Olympics.

    I’ve decided to be against the Olympics ever since the Lottery turned down our local advice centre’s application for five years’ continuation funding – as it has a massive proportion of such applications – on the basis that the money is not there, and I then realised (they say as much in their rejection letter) that this is because of the diversion of millions of pounds from countrywide community projects to building an Olympic village in East London.

    Our advice centre helps significant numbers of some of the poorest people in the country to at least keep just about hanging on financially, keep their rented homes, keep their families out of care, keep in reasonable health. But like similar centres all over the country after getting the thumbs-down from the Lottery last week we had to lay off our staff, and the future looks grim.

    Jonathan Edwards said: “The money being spent to host the Games has the possibility to change this country, not just up until 2012 but the for the next 50 years.”

    You’re right Jonathan, it’ll send some people deep into poverty for their whole lifetime, and increase inequality way beyond even today’s scandalous extremes.

    It’s not really about a logo.

  11. Bimble says:

    I’ve been to an Olympics (as a spectator to Turino) and they had a cool mountain-esq logo, Vancouver will be having an Inukshuk, which is a traditional Inuit design. Salt Lake was a snow crystal, Nagano was a flower with the petals representing athletes in different sports.

    Bejing has a Chinese seal depicting the charactor ‘Jing’ (from the name of the host city), Athens had the olive wreaths, Sydney had the cool athlete made of bomerangs. Atlanta had the Olympic Flames and Barcelona also had a stylised man.

    If someone can please tell me how this represents Britain, London, sports or any of the mentioned I would be quite happy to accept it.

    It looks very funky, and I could imagine graffitti being very similar and so attracting that part of society.

    Least it’s better than the Mexico ’68 logo!! Mexico 1968

  12. Paul says:

    It’s growing on me. But then, I live in Australia…

  13. Rev Ruth says:

    It looks like it is being withdrawn anyway because it has caused epileptic fits in about a dozen people who watched it. It hadn’t been tested for that.

    Shame, I quite liked it. But not a shame really if it hurts people.

  14. Chris Pettifer says:

    Haven’t they had to change (or remove) the animation because it caused epiletic (spelling?) fits? e.g. the video you link to doesn’t have an animated logo in it that I can see…

    I am personally not particularly grabbed by the logo. When I first saw it I could not see that it was a stylised version of the digits 2012! You may have heard people commenting it could easily be “developed” into 2013 if required..?

  15. Chris Pettifer says:

    Apparently they’ve removed a 4 second clip with a diver in it or something?

  16. Emmie says:

    Hey Dave that’s a cool logo. I’ve given you the Thinker Blog award and you can accept it if you want or not accept it – it’s your choice. I’ve posted it here [link deleted] if you want to know more.

  17. JT says:

    What’s this – the newspapers making a big fuss over something trivial? Well there’s a thing!

  18. Gregory Porilo says:

    I’m afraid I don’t like it at all. At least if the word “London” had a capital “L” then it would be better. To spell the name of our capital city without a capital letter is, in my opinion, an insult to Londoners.

  19. Dave says:

    Emmie – I haven’t post your link because I object to the large ad telling me it is scanning my computer and encouraging me to download a programme which is almost certainly spyware. It isn’t anything personal against you.

  20. Ian M says:

    I don’t really understand why we need a logo.

    but then again, I don’t understand why we need the Olympics either….

  21. Gretel says:

    In reply to Bimble, the logo fragments represent London’s divided opinions about the Olympics. The logo also shows the way in which the various sports will be scattered all over the city and how there will be no good way of getting from one site to another – cunningly displayed in the logo by not having a connection between any of the pink bits (our London public transport system only just limps along at present…) The different colours for the logo (nasty orange/nasty pink/ nasty blue etc.) are probably supposed to represent London’s multi-cultural diversity, which is something people in committees talk about. Did I mention I didn’t like the logo? ;-)

  22. Bimble says:

    So you’re saying that it reperesents just how badly the Olympics are going to be run…. ahhhh…. well, in that case it’s perfect!!

  23. Miss Dagurreotype says:

    Yes, there has been a problem with the animation of the logo. I read about it earlier today on the BBC.

    As to logo designs, personally, I liked the one Richard Voysey sent the BBC. It is simple, it has the rings, and it has both 2012 and London. I just don’t like the color combo on the official one. Maybe if they’d stuck to the colors of the Union, it would look better. The official logo just doesn’t say “London” to me.

  24. Michelle says:

    I hate the pink! It reminds me of the revolting travel sickness pills I had to take a lot as a kid (not that they worked!).

  25. Ellen says:

    I am a bit worried about the potential for epilepsy (as reported today on the news at 6pm). If it is true I have put myself in a lot of danger cos I looked at it for quite a while to see how may times it moved and changed colours.

  26. ash says:

    Dave, what do you mean by ‘animated’? I watched the video you link to, and the logo is static: it never moves.

  27. Jonathan Horniblow says:

    Well, the Richard Voysey logo won by a long way, with the official logo getting less than 3%.
    I don’t even understand what was wrong with the original logo!
    It had all the elements, was clear, pleasant and disctinctive, and it had the Olympic ribbon flowing in the iconic shape of the Thames through London.
    If a logo needs explaining, it’s not a good design.

    More worrying is that Jonathan Ellis closed the poll (which reached 48,000 signatures in 3 days) after pressure. We live in dark times.

    Remember, the new logo cost FOUR HUNDRED THOUSAND POUNDS. JUST the logo. Not the implementation or the animated version or the film. JUST the logo.

  28. Wayne says:

    I think they stole that logo from my 5yr old.