More photos from London last week:
1.

2.

The latest book
Advertisement Feature

Book 3
The book before that
The first book
See the:
See my blog posts about:
Do a search
Archives
5 popular cartoons
Links
The Cartoon Blog
Dave Walker's blog. Dave is a freelance cartoonist who draws a weekly 'Guide to the Church' for the Church Times. (more)Follow via:
The blog by email:
Recent Comments Grouped by Post
The Last 10 Comments
Things you can do
Recent Posts
Subscribe
Other sundries
If you enjoyed this post you might also enjoy these (possibly)
related articles:
If you liked this post why not send it to someone else by e-mail? Click here to do so.
This is a single post on the Cartoon Blog by Dave
posted on Sunday, May 13th, 2007 at 11:51 pm. Click here to read all of the latest posts.
Both comments and pings are currently closed.
Other things technologically advanced people may like to do: trackback from another site, follow responses via the comments feed, bookmark on del.icio.us or digg.
OK, I should come clean. The church is really there there, the railings are really there and the sign is really there. But the railings don’t belong to the church.
Hehe, our church regulary has poker nights. And im anglican! They are great nights with lots of laughs, and a great mix of crispys and non crispys. And we havent got yelled at by toomany other churches yet… but I think its because they dont really know.
I don’t know how you can tell us that with a straight face
Does the trades descriptions act apply to churches at all, I wonder? If the sermon isn’t actually interesting, can any action be taken? Best leave off such dangerous adjectives, I’d have though, CoE, discretion being the better part of valour and all.
so..er…who do the railings belong to?
You’ve been pligg’d over at blogs4God … and it wasn’t my doing!
Somebody else likes you too!!!
Anglican Poker nights… Might hit issues with encouraging gambling there.
Talking gambling and Churches, I did hear about a Church once that needed to raise some funds, and the PCC took the decision to bet some money on a horse – a sure-fire winner, but at fairly long odds. Needless to say the Archdeacon got wind of this and put a stop to it. The irony being that the sure-fire winner came in…
Are they using ‘interesting’ in the way that I got told off for using it yesterday?
As in the same way which ‘unique’ might be used to avoid using an outright negative term?
Trackback whathaveyou