Skip to main content.
« Previous entry: Liveblogging the football | Main page | Next entry: Cartoon Blog distance learning »

June 16th, 2006

Online anger

you make me so angry

How do we cope with online anger? That is the subject of today’s essay.

We all get angry sometimes. We can be angry about things we read online, or angry at things we encounter offline (‘in real life’, as I like to call it) and then are tempted to express our anger online.

The problem with expressing anger online is that we run the risk of leaving a plaque set in concrete on the walls of the internet testifying to our own idiocy. Once something is written on a webpage it often stays written. Even if it is deleted then search engines will have picked it up and it wil be transmitted onwards to future generations who will marvel at how foolish we were and then place the worst examples in a Museum of Online Stupidity.

As bloggers we have a responibility to speak the truth as far as we are aware of it. It is tempting to lash out at people or organisations who have done us wrong. I do it all the time. But then again often by speaking out we have the chance to warn other people so that they do not buy or use the services of Idiots, of whom there are many. I suppose we should be careful not to overstate the case. The problem with writing a humourous column is that overstating the case is what makes people laugh (Sometimes, at least. I would not like to assume that people are laughing all the time).

It is important to express your anger somehow though. Unexpressed anger is a road to all sorts of inner turmoil. I should know. But writing it down online is perhaps not the best form of therapy. Try something like scrumpling up a ball of paper. Go on – scrumple that paper!

I know of one internet bulletin board that has a special area set aside where people can be angry with each other. The idea is that by containing the anger it does not spill over into the discussion in other areas of that website. Does it work? Well, yes, sort of. As long as you don’t take everything written in that space too seriously.

I still think though that in that example and on the internet generally people later regret typing things that they would not say if they were face to face, human being to human being. We hide behind our pseudonyms and our blog pages because it makes it easier for us to speak out. But after the dust has settled I at least find that when I have expressed myself strongly I wish that I had toned it down a bit.

There is one exception to all of this. People who make unsolicited telephone calls. They deserve everything they get*.

*The final paragraph was included to inject a note of humour into the proceedings. If you only take one thing away from today’s message let it be the lovey-dovey stuff beforehand about loving your neighbour, teaching the world to sing in perfect harmony etc etc.

20 Comments »



Share this on Facebook:

If you enjoyed this post you might also enjoy these (possibly) related articles:

If you liked this post why not send it to someone else by e-mail? Click here to do so.

This is a single post on the Cartoon Blog by Dave posted on Friday, June 16th, 2006 at 11:02 am. Click here to read all of the latest posts. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Other things technologically advanced people may like to do: trackback from another site, follow responses via the comments feed, bookmark on del.icio.us or digg.

20 Responses to “Online anger”


  1. eve says:

    Very funny cartoon; and although you didn’t say it in your essay: besides “scrumpling” (?) a piece of paper, humor is also a great outlet for anger, and a much more enjoyable way of getting strong feelings out on the table (and much less regret later.) (As long as it’s not too mean-spirited.) Obviously, this is something you already know.

  2. eve says:

    OK, Dave, this is my first time on your site., And I have already posted something that makes me so embarassed. I told you in my previous post (re: your essay about anger) that I thought humor was also a great outlet for anger (besides “scrumpling” paper—still going “?” about “scrumpling”) . ANYWAY, I told you I recommended humor as a healthy outlet for expressing strong feelings. Then I looked through some of your cartoons, and realized YOU ARE THE FUNNIEST PERSON ON THE PLANET. So, please. I bow at your feet, and apologize for stating the obvious to a person who is an inventor of humor. (And thanks a lot for reminding me that comments can live forever in cyberspace.)

  3. Larry Day says:

    Excellent cartoon and essay Dave. I am very bad at expressing anger, but like Eve above, believe humour is a great way to try. The in the long run some of the stories at
    http://www.theforgivenessproject.com/ make for inspiring reading. I don’t know how some of them forgive.

  4. Dave says:

    Thanks Eve, though you are slightly too kind. Please don’t be embarassed – you made a good point. A fellow commenter might be inspired to express their anger through humour, and as a result the world will be a better place for us all.

    As for scrumpling – I just did a quick google and it seems it is very much a minority activity. How odd! I think it is like ‘crumpling’, but slightly more so. It happens mainly to paper.

    Thanks Larry. That is indeed a good and worthwhile site. I saw the exhibition at Greenbelt the other year. I thought I had written about it in the past, but I don’t think I have.

    OK, back to work. If you see me here again before 5pm you will have just cause to reprimand me.

  5. MadPriest says:

    Hi. I started my site because I truly believe there is not enough “Christlike” angry humour among Christian humourists (Christlike angry humour, as in “you nest of vipers,” & “get behind me, Satan,” that sort of thing). Look at the “Church Times” (they print my gentle captions but never print my “wicked” captions even though they know they’re the funniest). Look at “Ship Of Fools,” the honest stuff is well buried in the chat rooms. Look at Dave Walker (he’s so nice he makes me spew – I bet people really like him and he has lots of girls chasing after him and old ladies buying him dinner). You have to go to the States to find a more biting Christian satire.

    Satire is dangerous and cruel, but it is sometimes the only weapon the oppressed have against powers and dominions. I have certain rules that I really do try to follow, the two most important of which are never attack anybody with less power than yourself (unless they are called Dave) and never say anything about anybody that you would not be prepared to say to their face (though it is usually a case of “chance would be a fine thing.”) As you know, my site is not annonymous at a local level, yet it is the powers at local level that tend to get both barrells fired at them.

  6. MadPriest says:

    Sorry. One other thing Dave. Like you, most of your readers are well adjusted, pleasant people. If you want to tell nice people about Jesus then do nice humour. But, if like me, you want to tell angry people about Jesus, I think it is more honest if you are an angry person yourself. Otherwise, you would be a charletan and your mission would be a sham.

  7. MadPriest says:

    J’accuse!

    You’re just angry with angry people.

    Aha!

  8. Dave says:

    Madpriest,

    Thanks. You make a lot of points. I think essentially nothing that you are saying differs with anything I am saying – I think we are making different points. Various thoughts:

    I think humour is a good response to anger.

    I’m not sure that humour can be divided into the ‘angry’ and the ‘non angry’. Is my humour ‘nice’ and there fore not of interest to ‘angry’ people? I’m not sure. Not for me to say perhaps.

    “You have to go to the States to find a more biting Christian satire”. Hmmm. ‘Biting satire’, in my experience, is often another way of saying ‘not that funny’.

    I find the accusation that I am ‘well adjusted’ offensive.

  9. MadPriest says:

    O.k. I’m sorry. I’ve just looked at your blog photo and you’re obviously NOT well-adjusted. In fact, looking at it again, I’m surprised that you are still allowed to roam free.

    Your humour is usually gentle, but I like it best when you cross the line and become just a little bit wicked.

    I dare you – try and get something a “little bit wicked” passed the “Church Times” censors.

  10. augustus meriwether says:

    I have found the best way to handle online anger is to simply be drunk and to post the first thing that comes to mind.

    It is amazing what earthy truths can be exposed for the world to gawp at, much as it will with a motorway pile-up, with a few beers down you.

    I find it an exhilerating affirmation of my primeval masculinity to be lurking with my gin bottle on the edges of the virtual broadbands of wrath, ready to evacuate my burgeoning spleen onto the screens of people with tidy hair and immaculate jumpers slash hairdoes (and I would slash them given societal license – unfortunately I am forbade).

    The cost is simply everlasting shame and self-loathing. These are conditions I have become inured to. With enough bitterness you may too. Drink of this cup?

    Melodrama is a side-effect of all this, btw.

  11. augustus meriwether says:

    Another side-effect is not to be immediately aware that ‘tidy hair’ and ‘immaculate… hairdoes’ is basically the same thing, hence ERROR CITY.

    It might make you more comfortable if you look at me as being a science project at school, only slightly more distasteful as the frog vivisection.

    This is how you can neutralise the anger impulse, you become so concerned with how many times you reveal a subconcious obsession with hairdoes.

    Can you imagine what it’s like going to the barbers?

    And you thought there were important issues in the world. No, you know NOTHING.

  12. joeturner says:

    Curious how we treat emotions in church. Some emotions are ok and we can talk about them. Some are BAD BAD BAD and we can only have them if we hide behind something else eg humour (not that I’m suggesting humour is a bad thing in itself, and I agree that Dave is a very funny bloke).

    But the weirdest thing is that we seem to imagine that we’ve got quite balance lives really and we’re modelling it on some biblical example.

    I want to know who this mythical biblical character was who didn’t get angry or sad or miserable or introverted or depressed or feel worthless, cos to be honest, I can’t think of one.

    Joe

    PS I am going to release a new book of christian choruses called Real Emotions for Every Occasion based on the book of Psalms.

    Listings will probably include songs like:

    Oh God I really hate you
    I’m not sure you really exist
    Why do I feel so sad?
    How come I can’t kick my addiction?
    How come I can’t kick my cat?
    Why do I have to be so NICE all the time?

  13. Michelle says:

    I think it would do a lot of Christians a lot of good to be able to express themselves with a bit more honesty… like in Joe’s song titles! It reminds me of something Adrian Plass once wrote that I often come back to, and that is the image of a young child being angry, and pummelling away with their fists, within the embrace – the enfolding hug of a loving father. It seems to me that that’s the sort of place the angry Psalmists were in with God?

  14. Dave says:

    Other thoughts posted too late in the evening to make sense:

    Augustus – I like your comments. I don’t understand them all, but that is good.

    Joe: I did not mention God or church or Christians in my post. Not that you said I did.

    I said nothing against being “angry or sad or miserable or introverted or depressed” or feeling worthless. These things happen and we should not feel guilty. I know you didn’t say that I did say anything along these lines.

    My point really was only to do with how we express anger on the internet. When we do we can often look a bit silly in hindsight. Other times it’s the right thing to do perhaps, but I feel these times are in the minority.

    Michelle – absolutely. Just as long as they stop and consider before posting it on a web page.

  15. Chorister says:

    I find it very difficult to get angry about anything written down on a bulletin board – obviously my brain hasn’t yet been fully assimilated into cyberspace.
    But I take your point about using the net to express our anger about real life situations. I guess sometimes a public display is the only way to feel you’ve been heard in a situation of helplessness (why else do Fathers for Justice dress up like Batman or Spiderman and prance about on large, famous buildings?). Rather like the Psalms, really. Having your songs sung all over the world is rather more public (and timeless) than merely having a good moan to your sheep on the hillside.

  16. Michelle says:

    Sorry Dave, got a bit sidetracked before with general anger! Thinking before you speak is definitely advisable when posting on the internet… long after your anger may have cooled – there it is, still visible for all to see (and to assume it still reflects your feelings/perspective).

  17. Dave says:

    Chorister – interesting point about the Psalmist. He obviously can’t have minded people using his angry songs sung all over the world seeing as he made them into a songbook. At least, I assume he did. My Biblical knowledge is sketchy in that area.

    Michelle – no need to apologise. Sidetrack-edness is a virtue in my book.

  18. Karin says:

    Hmmm. Perhaps what Joe says about some churches or some people in some churches giving the impression that certain emotions shouldn’t be felt or experienced by Christians is the reason that the certain internet bulletin board you were thinking of feels the need to have that special area set aside where people can be angry with each other.

    Of course repression of anger and other ‘negative feelings’ doesn’t just happen in churches and the internet can seem like a place where we don’t need to feel accountable and may be able to avoid the consequences of expressing anger etc. There is a chance that the person you were unpleasant to doesn’t know where you live or where you drink, so they can’t come and thump you like they might in real life.

    Should the internet provide more anger management courses, I wonder? What if it were possible to make someone’s pc log in only to an on-line management course if they had been abusive on a website??!!??

  19. joeturner says:

    Sorry for the tangent…

    I think the christian subculture pervades even blogs by christians. But you’re right, sorry for taking this in a direction it wasn’t intended.

  20. Lorna says:

    good point …