The spectrum of cartoon quality
If you enjoyed this post you might also enjoy these (possibly)
related articles:
- Water cartoon
- Free 2007 Cartoon Calendars
- Leunig
- Work cartoon
- All the posts in these categories: Cartooning, Cartoons
- The main Cartoon Blog page containing all of the latest entries
If you liked this post why not send it to someone else by e-mail? Click here to do so.
This is a single post on the Cartoon Blog by Dave
posted on Monday, April 10th, 2006 at 3:38 pm. Click here to read all of the latest posts.
Both comments and pings are currently closed.
Other things technologically advanced people may like to do: trackback from another site, follow responses via the comments feed, bookmark on del.icio.us or digg.
4 Responses to “The spectrum of cartoon quality”
-
Nefertiki says:
Just what cartoon fanciers fancy – and the cartoon standardistas as well – a set of standards which can be used to express our appreciation of cartoons and rate their quality. e.g.:
The Sprectum of cartoon quality
Rating: FantisticThe system works!
April 10th, 2006 at 5:02 pm -
Sam says:
Thanks Dave – now adjectives can be quantitive as well as just qualitative.
There’s a twist at the bottom end of the scale – is there not a twist at the top end too? Where cartoons are too good to be good cartoons, and become something else again?
-
Rob says:
You mean in a Leonardo DaVinci kind of way?
-
Nefertiki says:
Sam, I like your concept of ‘twist at the top…where cartoons become something else again’– this is provocative and has the ring of truth. But to me, Sam, not like Da Vinci as I find him unqualifiable. More like Empedocles perhaps. But yes, like da vinci in that there’s so much more than meets the eye.





Dave Walker's blog. Dave is a freelance cartoonist who draws a weekly 'Guide to the Church' for the Church Times. (
