Skip to main content.
« Previous entry: If females were given mitres | Main page | Next entry: Save the post office »

November 8th, 2005

Diamond Geezer is analysing us

Diamond Geezer is doing some blog analysis (week starting 7th November 2005 in case you are reading this in the future). The Cartoon Blog is one of 50 blogs under the microscope, in my case under the ‘10 most recent blogs to link to me‘ category. So far he has picked up that I’m reasonable good at blogging every day (14 days in a row, but not 21) and have a topic focus (He calls it CofE, which is fair enough, though I think ‘church’ and ‘cartoons’ have a reasonably equal representation).

I happen to know that he is about to look at comments, in particular the number of comments per week. So, I’d like everyone to act normally, but remember that if you’re commenting to be on your best behaviour. Please don’t comment excessively as we’re sure to be found out for trying to tamper with the results, but don’t be shy either. Please be interesting, but not a lot more interesting than normal. I’d like to emphasise: There is no need to panic, but this is very important. Let’s not let ourselves down. Thank you.

4 Comments »



Share this on Facebook:

If you enjoyed this post you might also enjoy these (possibly) related articles:

If you liked this post why not send it to someone else by e-mail? Click here to do so.

This is a single post on the Cartoon Blog by Dave posted on Tuesday, November 8th, 2005 at 4:49 pm. Click here to read all of the latest posts. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Other things technologically advanced people may like to do: trackback from another site, follow responses via the comments feed, bookmark on del.icio.us or digg.

4 Responses to “Diamond Geezer is analysing us”


  1. di says:

    Unfortunately, Dave, I did all my analysis last weekend before I announced I was carrying out a survey. So, for example, I already know that you had the second highest number of ‘comments per post’ in your category.

    I didn’t analyse ‘comment quality’ though, because that could be rather subjective…

  2. Dave says:

    Thanks DG. Second in category – not bad I suppose. Reminds me of being at Crufts.

    It’s ok everyone, comment quality isn’t under consideration. You can slack off again now.

  3. Maddie says:

    Blah blah blah balh halb alhb lhab bhal

  4. Kyle (Captain Sacrament) says:

    Yeah, and my comments are usually very insightful.

    Don’t think about elephants!