<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Christian blogs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cartoonchurch.com/blog/2005/06/15/christian-blogs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cartoonchurch.com/blog/2005/06/15/christian-blogs/</link>
	<description>by Dave Walker</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 07:58:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: adrian</title>
		<link>http://www.cartoonchurch.com/blog/2005/06/15/christian-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-176</link>
		<dc:creator>adrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2005 18:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cartoonchurch.com/blog/2005/06/15/christian-blogs/#comment-176</guid>
		<description>MAnaged to get to a PC to find out what the concern was over.  Ultimately if your RSS feed is published on your website you are asking for it to be included in all kinds of services both christian and not so I am surprised by this level of concern.

I will remove any blogs that are incorrectly in the blogdom list.

If anyone can send me a list of blogs I should remove I will do so (if you ask me to remove someone elses blog I reserve the right to not do so without discussing it with them and/or a group of christian bloggers of my choosing)

Have just been trying to servet the Christian blogosphere here and am sorry for any offense.  Did not see these comments till today. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MAnaged to get to a PC to find out what the concern was over.  Ultimately if your RSS feed is published on your website you are asking for it to be included in all kinds of services both christian and not so I am surprised by this level of concern.</p>
<p>I will remove any blogs that are incorrectly in the blogdom list.</p>
<p>If anyone can send me a list of blogs I should remove I will do so (if you ask me to remove someone elses blog I reserve the right to not do so without discussing it with them and/or a group of christian bloggers of my choosing)</p>
<p>Have just been trying to servet the Christian blogosphere here and am sorry for any offense.  Did not see these comments till today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.cartoonchurch.com/blog/2005/06/15/christian-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-173</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2005 18:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cartoonchurch.com/blog/2005/06/15/christian-blogs/#comment-173</guid>
		<description>Personally, I think you are going a bit overboard here.  I just stumbled across the BoG thing and thought it was an okay idea.  None of your reasons even crossed my mind (and I doubt they would cross the minds of many people).  I just thought &quot;hey, simple links to Christian bloggers.&quot;  I don&#039;t have to go to their sites if I don&#039;t want to, but if I want to browse it makes it easy to go out and read new things.  As you said, much of the content is not stuff I want to read, so I either don&#039;t go to their site or just move on to the next one.  As far as making a &quot;list without their permission [being] morally dubious&quot; I would definitely have to disagree.  Blogs are public sites, things that you want private, you make private.  I do agree that if requested, links should be removed.

I guess I just don&#039;t understand why you are so up-in-arms over this.  Dialogue between blogs is always a good thing.

Anyway, my two cents.
Matt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I think you are going a bit overboard here.  I just stumbled across the BoG thing and thought it was an okay idea.  None of your reasons even crossed my mind (and I doubt they would cross the minds of many people).  I just thought &#8220;hey, simple links to Christian bloggers.&#8221;  I don&#8217;t have to go to their sites if I don&#8217;t want to, but if I want to browse it makes it easy to go out and read new things.  As you said, much of the content is not stuff I want to read, so I either don&#8217;t go to their site or just move on to the next one.  As far as making a &#8220;list without their permission [being] morally dubious&#8221; I would definitely have to disagree.  Blogs are public sites, things that you want private, you make private.  I do agree that if requested, links should be removed.</p>
<p>I guess I just don&#8217;t understand why you are so up-in-arms over this.  Dialogue between blogs is always a good thing.</p>
<p>Anyway, my two cents.<br />
Matt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bene Diction</title>
		<link>http://www.cartoonchurch.com/blog/2005/06/15/christian-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-168</link>
		<dc:creator>Bene Diction</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2005 03:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cartoonchurch.com/blog/2005/06/15/christian-blogs/#comment-168</guid>
		<description>Dave:

I don&#039;t know if I was the originator or not.
I&#039;ve always used a small g for god. 

I just found myself on the Blogdom of God.
I&#039;d asked to be removed I was told it was done when the project first started.

To be honest, I&#039;m annoyed and disappointed to find my blog there.
Good choice of words Ali. 

Once I get over me I have to hold out hope other bloggers that don&#039;t want to be in the Blogdom are listened to.
Now I wait again, and see if I&#039;m heard this time.:^( 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave:</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know if I was the originator or not.<br />
I&#8217;ve always used a small g for god. </p>
<p>I just found myself on the Blogdom of God.<br />
I&#8217;d asked to be removed I was told it was done when the project first started.</p>
<p>To be honest, I&#8217;m annoyed and disappointed to find my blog there.<br />
Good choice of words Ali. </p>
<p>Once I get over me I have to hold out hope other bloggers that don&#8217;t want to be in the Blogdom are listened to.<br />
Now I wait again, and see if I&#8217;m heard this time.:^(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ali</title>
		<link>http://www.cartoonchurch.com/blog/2005/06/15/christian-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-167</link>
		<dc:creator>Ali</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2005 23:42:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cartoonchurch.com/blog/2005/06/15/christian-blogs/#comment-167</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m wondering who is on the new and improved Blogdom list.  I&#039;d rather not be there.  It feels off to me, I dislike blog promotion, and this feels like marketing, commercial and glossy.  

I have a small list of UK Christian blogs, just a list of links here:
http://www.quantumtea.com/ukgodblogs/
The main way it grows is people email me and ask to be on there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m wondering who is on the new and improved Blogdom list.  I&#8217;d rather not be there.  It feels off to me, I dislike blog promotion, and this feels like marketing, commercial and glossy.  </p>
<p>I have a small list of UK Christian blogs, just a list of links here:<br />
<a href="http://www.quantumtea.com/ukgodblogs/" rel="nofollow">http://www.quantumtea.com/ukgodblogs/</a><br />
The main way it grows is people email me and ask to be on there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.cartoonchurch.com/blog/2005/06/15/christian-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-166</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2005 23:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cartoonchurch.com/blog/2005/06/15/christian-blogs/#comment-166</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right Funky Doug - though I have tried to trackback to his haloscan trackbacks and his site itself but I couldn&#039;t make them work. I suspect the fault is this end - I&#039;ve not had a lot of success making Wordpress   trackback - probably me. I&#039;ll go and add a comment in the old fashioned way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right Funky Doug &#8211; though I have tried to trackback to his haloscan trackbacks and his site itself but I couldn&#8217;t make them work. I suspect the fault is this end &#8211; I&#8217;ve not had a lot of success making WordPress   trackback &#8211; probably me. I&#8217;ll go and add a comment in the old fashioned way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Funky Dung</title>
		<link>http://www.cartoonchurch.com/blog/2005/06/15/christian-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-165</link>
		<dc:creator>Funky Dung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2005 23:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cartoonchurch.com/blog/2005/06/15/christian-blogs/#comment-165</guid>
		<description>make &quot;know&quot; &quot;address&quot; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>make &#8220;know&#8221; &#8220;address&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Funky Dung</title>
		<link>http://www.cartoonchurch.com/blog/2005/06/15/christian-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-164</link>
		<dc:creator>Funky Dung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2005 23:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cartoonchurch.com/blog/2005/06/15/christian-blogs/#comment-164</guid>
		<description>Last I checked, you hadn&#039;t tracked back to Adrian&#039;s post.  How is he to know people&#039;s concerns if he isn&#039;t aware of them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last I checked, you hadn&#8217;t tracked back to Adrian&#8217;s post.  How is he to know people&#8217;s concerns if he isn&#8217;t aware of them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.cartoonchurch.com/blog/2005/06/15/christian-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-161</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2005 18:29:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cartoonchurch.com/blog/2005/06/15/christian-blogs/#comment-161</guid>
		<description>Personally I find such aggregator blogs useless, they gather loads of &quot;Christian blogs&quot; content, yuk, 19/20 are of no interest to me, turn me off, make me sad I&#039;m associated with them... Surely the whole point of blogs is that you select the people that you want to read... and not have someone else shove the lot in your face!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally I find such aggregator blogs useless, they gather loads of &#8220;Christian blogs&#8221; content, yuk, 19/20 are of no interest to me, turn me off, make me sad I&#8217;m associated with them&#8230; Surely the whole point of blogs is that you select the people that you want to read&#8230; and not have someone else shove the lot in your face!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johann</title>
		<link>http://www.cartoonchurch.com/blog/2005/06/15/christian-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-160</link>
		<dc:creator>Johann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2005 18:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cartoonchurch.com/blog/2005/06/15/christian-blogs/#comment-160</guid>
		<description>I entirely agree with you Dave.  The whole thing sounds very dubious and unChristian.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I entirely agree with you Dave.  The whole thing sounds very dubious and unChristian.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.cartoonchurch.com/blog/2005/06/15/christian-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-157</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2005 17:14:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cartoonchurch.com/blog/2005/06/15/christian-blogs/#comment-157</guid>
		<description>Wood - don&#039;t worry, one day we&#039;ll get you a special aggregator all to yourself.

I&#039;m still thinking public aggregators are a grey area. There&#039;s more and more software coming in enabling people to syndicate your content on their sites - they may be doing it for good reasons or just to get google rankings for themselves or other dubious reasons. That&#039;s why I&#039;m wondering whether the time has come to get permission before any content from someone else&#039;s site goes onto an aggregator.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wood &#8211; don&#8217;t worry, one day we&#8217;ll get you a special aggregator all to yourself.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m still thinking public aggregators are a grey area. There&#8217;s more and more software coming in enabling people to syndicate your content on their sites &#8211; they may be doing it for good reasons or just to get google rankings for themselves or other dubious reasons. That&#8217;s why I&#8217;m wondering whether the time has come to get permission before any content from someone else&#8217;s site goes onto an aggregator.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

